Grant access to a resource

Do this when one person needs access to one object — a colleague who should be able to edit a single agent, or an agent that needs to read a specific skill. Grants are per object and per permission bit. Do not do this to give someone broad access to everything in a workspace; add them as a workspace member or admin instead. And do not do this to control what a running agent may do — tool restrictions, budgets and approvals are policy rules, not graph grants. See set a budget and authorize a tool call.

Prerequisites

A graph backend enabled: ACCESS_CONTROL_BACKEND=openfga. The setting defaults to disabled, and with it disabled every write here returns HTTP 503 and the permission service allows everything. Which stack you started decides whether it is on:

You ran	Compose file	Graph
`make up-dev`	`docker-compose.dev.yaml`	on — sets `ACCESS_CONTROL_BACKEND=openfga` and runs OpenFGA
`make up`	`docker-compose.yaml`	off — the file names neither the setting nor OpenFGA, so it falls through to `disabled`
Helm	`charts/agentarea`	on when `openfga.enabled=true`, which is the chart default

If you are on make up, switch to make up-dev or set the variable and run OpenFGA yourself before continuing.

You are a workspace admin. Every /v1/access-control endpoint requires it.
The subject is already a member of your workspace, and the object already exists in it. Both are checked before the tuple is written.
Read the AgentArea model — in particular that the three permission bits are independent.

Examples below assume API=http://localhost:8000 and a bearer token in $TOKEN.

Steps

Confirm the graph is on

curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" "$API/v1/access-control/graph" \
  | python3 -c 'import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print("enabled:", d["enabled"], "nodes:", len(d["nodes"]))'

enabled: false means no graph backend is configured — stop here and set ACCESS_CONTROL_BACKEND before continuing.

Choose the relation

The relation you send is mapped onto one of three grant relations on the resource. Pick by what the subject needs to do:

Send	Grants	Use when the subject must
`reader`	`reader`	view, use, execute, connect to, or operate the resource
`writer`	`writer`	edit, update or configure it
`manager`	`manager`	delete it or change who else has access

Four legacy names still resolve, so older scripts keep working: viewers and connectors map to reader, editors to writer, and owners and operators to manager.The bits do not imply each other. A subject with only manager cannot read the resource. To give somebody full access, write all three.

Write the grant

curl -s -X POST "$API/v1/access-control/relationships" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
        "namespace": "Agent",
        "object": "3f9c1e42-7b5a-4f3e-9a10-2c8d6b4e1f77",
        "relation": "writer",
        "subject_id": "User:alice@example.com"
      }'

namespace is one of Agent, MCPServer, Skill or SkillCollection. It selects the repository used to confirm the object belongs to your workspace; the tuple itself is always written against resource:<object>, because all four kinds are one generic type in the graph.subject_id takes two shapes. Use User:<user_id> for a person. Use Agent:<agent_uuid> to let one agent reach a resource in its own right — that agent must also be in your workspace.A successful write returns HTTP 201 and {"ok": true}. Writes are idempotent, so repeating one is safe.

Repeat for each bit you need

for rel in reader writer manager; do
  curl -s -X POST "$API/v1/access-control/relationships" \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
    -d "{\"namespace\":\"Agent\",\"object\":\"$AGENT_ID\",\"relation\":\"$rel\",\"subject_id\":\"User:alice@example.com\"}"
done

To revoke, send the same body to DELETE /v1/access-control/relationships. It returns HTTP 204.

Verify

Ask the graph directly. relation accepts the same verbs the application uses, and they are mapped onto the underlying bit:

curl -s -X POST "$API/v1/access-control/check" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
        "namespace": "Agent",
        "object": "3f9c1e42-7b5a-4f3e-9a10-2c8d6b4e1f77",
        "relation": "edit",
        "subject_id": "User:alice@example.com"
      }'

{"allowed": true}

To see why it was allowed — direct grant, role assignment, project inheritance, or workspace admin — resolve the path:

curl -s -X POST "$API/v1/access-control/resolve" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
        "subject_id": "User:alice@example.com",
        "resource_kind": "agent",
        "resource_id": "3f9c1e42-7b5a-4f3e-9a10-2c8d6b4e1f77"
      }'

The response carries allowed, effective_relation, verb and a paths array. resource_kind is one of skill, collection, mcp or agent. You can also list what has been written:

curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  "$API/v1/access-control/relationships?namespace=Agent" \
  | python3 -m json.tool

Troubleshooting

403 Only a workspace admin may modify the authorization graph

Every endpoint under /v1/access-control requires workspace admin, including the read and check endpoints. Being the resource’s owner is not enough.

403 Agent:<id> not found in your workspace

The object id is wrong, belongs to another workspace, or you are sending it with the wrong namespace. The lookup uses the namespace to pick the repository, so an MCP server id sent with "namespace": "Agent" fails this way.

403 Subject user is not in your workspace

Add the person to the workspace first through POST /v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/invitations . Membership is resolved from the workspace owner plus the membership table, so a user who has been invited but has not accepted is not yet grantable.

422 Unsupported relation for a resource grant

You sent something outside the accepted set. Use reader , writer or manager .

422 Group (subject_set) grants are managed via project/role, not the explorer

This endpoint writes direct grants only. Bundled or group-scoped access goes through role and role_assignment objects — see model a custom relation .

503 Graph authorization is disabled or Graph authorization write failed

The first means ACCESS_CONTROL_BACKEND is disabled . The second means OpenFGA was reachable but rejected or dropped the write; the API deliberately does not fall back to allowing the operation, so check the OpenFGA container before retrying.

The grant exists and the user still cannot read

Almost always the independent-bits rule. Check all three separately — read , edit and manage each need their own tuple, and a manager grant confers neither of the others.

The grant exists and nothing changed in the product

Only a handful of API call sites consult the graph today: agent, skill and MCP server edit and delete, model instance delete, and registered- client use. List and read endpoints are scoped by workspace in the database and are not graph-filtered, so a grant will not make a resource appear or disappear from a list.

The AgentArea model

The types and inheritance behind these tuples

Model a custom relation

When direct grants are not enough

Review the audit trail

Note that grant changes are not recorded there

Start here

Concepts

Guides

Self-host

Reference

API reference

API endpoints

Community

Grant access to a resource

Prerequisites

Steps

Confirm the graph is on

Choose the relation

Write the grant

Repeat for each bit you need

Verify

Troubleshooting

The AgentArea model

Model a custom relation

Review the audit trail

​Prerequisites

​Steps

Confirm the graph is on

Choose the relation

Write the grant

Repeat for each bit you need

​Verify

​Troubleshooting

​Related

The AgentArea model

Model a custom relation

Review the audit trail

Prerequisites

Steps

Verify

Troubleshooting

Related